The Past Does Not Define Us

The Past Does Not Define Us

“What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.” ~Ralph Waldo Emerson

The past does not define us; what does is only what we choose to be.

We are slaves to the past only by our choosing. For it is only by unwillingness do we refuse to let the past remain there.

To enslave one’s self to the past is to relive it within one’s own mind — the past becomes an overbearing and overarching foe, an obstructing veil that colors what we do and how we live. Worst of all, those with whom we interact, those who cannot see and seldom realize the veil of the past that you choose to wear, suffer the consequences of misunderstanding, miscommunication, and strained relations.

The past serves us with lessons and reminders. The past is a path that has lead us to this moment. As a hiker does not dwell upon the rocks that caused her to slip, or the creek that demanded from her a leap of faith so that she might cross it, dwelling upon challenges and trials of our pasts serve only to obstruct us from living fully, today.

Allowing the past to define us today adversely affects friendships and relationships because we obligate others to determine, dissect, and understand occurrences and influences of the past that influence our behavior today. To willfully burden a friend, family member or lover with the task of unmasking and fully understand the unseen and increasingly-distant influences of the past is an unfair burden that will surely complicate happiness.

While the past has heavily influenced who we are and who we have become, it does not define, limit, or restrict us and who we choose to be. Our potential — what we allow ourselves to do today, and what we do on behalf of a better tomorrow — is always unlimited.

Please enable Javascript and Flash to view this Viddler video.

You Might Also Enjoy...


10 Responses to “The Past Does Not Define Us”

  1. Dave says:

    I am greatly enjoying the ongoing discussion about this post on social networking websites, especially Reddit.

    Many are concluding that the past does indeed define us, insofar as what has happened in the past has decisively influenced who we are and brought us to the present moment. This is undoubtedly true and is even asserted in the piece: “…the past has heavily influenced who we are and who we have become…”.

    However, I’d like to remind readers that the intent of the piece is to say that the past — one’s personal history, what has influenced, happened to or affected someone before the present moment — absolutely does not limit someone’s potential: “…[the past] does not define, limit, or restrict us and who we choose to be.”

    In other words, while our individual pasts have brought us to this moment (who we have become), we are not slaves to what has happened because the past does not limit our unlimited potential of what we can become, what we can dream, and what we can achieve.

    Dave

    Reply  |  Quote
  2. David Sloand says:

    Great entry Dave!

    You should, if you haven’t already, check out Sartre’s concept of “Bad Faith”. I think its one of the more uplifting, and truly human perspectives that he builds.

    Keep it up, hope the book process is coming along. I’ll check back soon.

    Reply  |  Quote
  3. Dave says:

    Thanks for the compliment and recommendation. I’ll definitely check that out!

    D

    Reply  |  Quote
  4. David Sloand says:

    Just to clarify:

    When I said the concept of “Bad Faith” was uplifting, I meant that the conclusion, the extrapolation, that we, as human beings, are radically free entities and that our choices are not governed by historicity was, to me, encouraging. Obviously the concept of relinquishing our free will doesn’t particularly appeal, haha.

    Reply  |  Quote
  5. Sarah Rendon says:

    I think this is my favorite piece so far! You should read Milan Kundera’s “The Unbearable Lightness of Being” for a completely different perspective on why we shouldn’t let the past define us. What he writes is deeply philosophical and has to do with the idea of eternal recurrence, but I think you would enjoy it.

    Reply  |  Quote
  6. Dave says:

    Thank you for the compliment and recommendation. I’ve actually come across Kundera’s book before, either seeing it on the bookshelf or checking it out online, but have yet to read it. Thanks again!

    Reply  |  Quote
  7. Teresita says:

    I completly agree with this passage.

    Reply  |  Quote
  8. LJ says:

    I believe we must be grateful to our past and not blame it. The choices we made are what has brought us to where we are now. The lessons were necessary and growth is not designed to be comfortable.

    Reply  |  Quote
  9. Anna says:

    Disagree whole heartedly.

    Our EMOTIONAL past doesn’t have consequence on our present lives, however, decisions I made as long as 5 years ago (failing to finish high school, not going to college soon, having a young pregnancy, and moving across the country twice) are now limiting and controlling how I live my life now.

    It’s never to late to try and change things, and we can take control now, but that doesn’t go against the fact that the past does and will continue to control us.

    Reply  |  Quote
  10. Dave says:

    @Anna — I would respond by saying it’s only by your choosing do you let the past control you today and tomorrow. As LJ mentions, and as I state earlier in the comments, the past influences where we are today, OF COURSE! :)

    The past has taken us to the present moment, but the intent of this piece is to say that if we hang on to the past and it prohibits us from moving forward in the present moment (and on behalf of tomorrow) that we are doign ourselves a disservice.

    Reply  |  Quote

Your Turn: What do you think?

 

Copyright © 2010 Dave Ursillo and DaveUrsillo.com. All Rights Reserved. Aperture Theme by WooThemes.